The Hong Kong Court of First Instance stays third party proceedings commenced by an insured against an insurer, on the basis that the parties are bound by the arbitration clause contained in the insurance policy. Despite the outcome being that the main action and the third party proceedings will ultimately be pursued in different forums, by upholding the parties’ contractual agreement to arbitrate, the Court reinforces its pro-arbitration credentials and the principle of party autonomy.
Read moreArbitration vs. Litigation: More Than Just a Preference for RWI Policyholders
On Jan. 15, 2021, a New York state court judge issued an opinion denying an insurer’s motion to dismiss a claim for coverage under a representations and warranties insurance (RWI) policy in WPP Group USA, Inc. v. RB/TDM Investors, LLC et al. More specifically, the court rejected the insurer’s argument that the claim was subject to certain exclusions under the policy and ordered the parties to proceed with discovery.
Resolving COVID related insurance claims - how can mediators help?
We have all followed the high profile test case, brought by the FCA, to clarify how Business Interruption policies should respond to pandemic related claims. The Supreme Court judgment in The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others has provided much needed guidance on the law is this area. Not least, it has overturned the egregious decision in the Orient Express Hotels case which left a hotel policyholder without cover from the impact of Hurricane Katrina. The court had decided in the now discredited case that a policy holder can’t claim for a BI loss if the event which caused it damage also led to wider area damage which would have affected its business even if it had suffered no direct loss!
Read moreUnderstanding the No Surprises Act
Starting January 1, 2022, it will be illegal for providers to bill patients for more than the in-network cost-sharing due under patients’ insurance in almost all scenarios where surprise out-of-network bills arise, with the notable exception of ground ambulance transport. Health plans must treat these out-of-network services as if they were in-network when calculating patient cost-sharing. The legislation also creates a new final-offer arbitration process to determine how much insurers must pay out-of-network providers. If an out-of-network provider is dissatisfied with a health plan’s payment, it can initiate arbitration. The arbitrator must select between the final offers submitted by each party, taking into consideration several factors including the health plan’s historical median in-network rate for similar services.
Read moreQuebec Superior Court Confirms Arbitrability of Insurance Coverage Disputes
Ending years of ambiguous jurisprudence, Justice Gary Morrison confirmed, in 9369-1426 Quebec Inc. (Restaurant Baton Rouge) v. Allianz Global Risks, that Quebec law allows the arbitration of disputes under an insurance policy to the exclusion of the courts.
Facing business interruption losses due to COVID-19, certain Baton Rouge franchisees sought to certify a class action against Allianz on behalf of all its insured restaurants and bars in Quebec claiming coverage under a property insurance policy. On behalf of Allianz, Clyde & Co moved to dismiss the action and prevent certification based on the Policy's dispute resolution clause, which provided for mediation and/or binding arbitration. Justice Morrison granted the motion and dismissed the action.
Read moreOver $22.8 Million Located, Returned To Tennessee Consumers
The Tennessee Department of Commerce & Insurance (TDCI) announces today that over $22.8 million was located and returned to Tennesseans in combined life insurance benefits/annuities and monies returned through the Department’s mediation efforts in 2020. TDCI’s figures show:
Read more